I agree. ChatGPT is good in ‘conversation’. Much like us, if give a question without context, it will answer with what it is processing not what the brain behind the keyboard is processing. The more interaction between that brain and the AI, the better the results. It is similar to listening. Go figure.
Understanding where the strengths of a fallible system and staying within the domain of said strengths to help you accelerate a deliverable would put you ahead of the critics every single time.
I use ChatGPT for first drafts. And this limiting of scope has helped me ask better questions about a topic and understand where I can find better oracles that check the draft provided.
I agree. ChatGPT is good in ‘conversation’. Much like us, if give a question without context, it will answer with what it is processing not what the brain behind the keyboard is processing. The more interaction between that brain and the AI, the better the results. It is similar to listening. Go figure.
Great thoughts - thank you, Alan!
Keep using those brains, folks!
Understanding where the strengths of a fallible system and staying within the domain of said strengths to help you accelerate a deliverable would put you ahead of the critics every single time.
I use ChatGPT for first drafts. And this limiting of scope has helped me ask better questions about a topic and understand where I can find better oracles that check the draft provided.